Gleaning Key Insights from the Analysis of 590 Subdivision Phases

This bar chart shows average share of subdivision phase acres for residential units. At 51.80%, Plant City had the lowest share. Alternatively, at 68.41%, Temple Terrace had the lowest share of subdivision phase acreage for residential units.

Published
January 1, 2025

Contact
Yassert A. Gonzalez – Manager – Economics, Demographics & Research – 813-582-7356 (o) – [email protected] – planhillsborough.org

Last updated
January 24, 2025

In an earlier blog, we confirmed that the number of new homes added to Hillsborough County’s tax rolls is more than sufficient to accommodate new families moving into the area. In this blog, we analyze 590 subdivision phases to determine the median acreage allocated to residential units.

What is a subdivision?

A subdivision is a parcel of land that has been surveyed and divided into lots for individual sale. Each parcel in the parcel feature class includes a subdivision phase attribute (e.g., “SUB”). For example, in 2016, 24 parcels were developed in the Lucaya Lake Club 1C subdivision phase, while in 2019, 120 parcels were developed in the Lucaya Lake Club Ph 3 subdivision phase. For this analysis, each subdivision phase is treated as a separate entity.

Key Takeaways

  1. Residential Acreage Allocation: On average, 51.50% of subdivision acreage is allocated to residential use, but this varies significantly across jurisdictions, reflecting differing land use priorities and environmental constraints.
  2. Unincorporated Hillsborough County Dominance: Nearly 90% of the studied subdivisions were in unincorporated Hillsborough County, showcasing its role as the primary driver of residential development in the area.
  3. Nonresidential Acreage Importance: Nonresidential acreage, such as wetlands, retention ponds, and amenities, plays a crucial role in making subdivisions sustainable and desirable, even when it reduces the residential share.
  4. Subdivision Size Differences: Plant City’s subdivisions tend to have larger phases (67.10 acres on average), while Temple Terrace’s are smaller (12.41 acres), reflecting distinct development patterns.
  5. Environmental Considerations: Subdivisions with low residential shares often allocate land to critical nonresidential uses, like flood control and open spaces, ensuring long-term community viability.

Subdivision Phase Selection Criteria

The sample consists of 590 subdivision phases that meet the following criteria:

  1. Primarily single-family homes
  2. Earliest construction year is 2015
  3. At least 10 residences built

Parcel Counts and Acreage

As shown in Table 1 and Figure 1, 89% of the subdivision phases were built in unincorporated Hillsborough County. On average, there were 84 parcels per subdivision phase. Figure 1 illustrates that Plant City had the highest average parcel count per subdivision phase (148 parcels), while Temple Terrace had the lowest (45 parcels).

Table 1 – Parcel Counts for Sample Subdivision Phases by Jurisdiction

JurisdictionSubdivisionsPercentParcel CountsPercentResidential ParcelsPercentNonresidential ParcelsPercentResidential ShareNonresidential ShareAverage Parcels per Subdivision Phase
Plant City111.86%1,6233.28%1,6053.31%181.89%98.89%1.11%148
Tampa488.14%2,1694.38%2,0944.31%757.89%96.54%3.46%45
Temple Terrace40.68%2520.51%2470.51%50.53%98.02%1.98%63
Unincorporated Hillsborough County52789.32%45,44791.83%44,59491.87%85389.70%98.12%1.88%86
Total590100.00%49,491100.00%48,540100.00%951100.00%98.08%1.92%84

Figure 1.  Average Parcel Counts for Sample Subdivision Phases by Jurisdiction

This bar chart shows average parcels per subdivision phase per jurisdiction. Plant City had the highest average number of parcels (148 parcels). Tampa had the lowest average number of parcels (45 parcels).
This bar chart shows average parcels per subdivision phase per jurisdiction. Plant City had the highest average number of parcels (148 parcels). Tampa had the lowest average number of parcels (45 parcels).

Table 2 and Figures 2a and 2b show that the average acreage for a subdivision phase is 26.04 acres, excluding roads. Plant City had the largest average acreage per subdivision phase (67.10 acres), while Temple Terrace had the smallest (12.41 acres). Residential acreage accounted for 51.50% of the total acreage in subdivision phases. This allocation ranged from 34.77% in Plant City to 67.57% in Temple Terrace. Nonresidential acreage, which supports homes (e.g., clubhouses, sports facilities, open space, retention ponds), is essential for enhancing the desirability and functionality of these subdivision phases.

Table 2 – Parcel Acreage for Sample Subdivision Phases by Jurisdiction

JurisdictionSubdivisionsPercentAcreagePercentResidential AcreagePercentNonresidential AcreagePercentResidential ShareNonresidential ShareAverage Acreage per Subdivision Phase
Plant City111.86%738.084.80%256.653.44%481.446.09%34.77%65.23%67.10
Tampa488.14%884.925.76%284.433.82%600.507.59%32.14%67.86%18.44
Temple Terrace40.68%49.630.32%33.540.45%16.100.20%67.57%32.43%12.41
Unincorporated Hillsborough County52789.32%13,688.6189.11%6,875.6392.29%6,812.9886.12%50.23%49.77%25.97
Total590100.00%15,361.25100.00%7,450.23100.00%7,911.01100.00%48.50%51.50%26.04

Figure 2a.  Average Acres for Sample Subdivision Phases by Jurisdiction

This bar chart shows the average acreage per subdivision phase per jurisdiction. Plant City had the highest number of acres per subdivision phase (67.10 acres). Temple Terrace had the lowest number of acres per subdivision phase (12.41 acres).
This bar chart shows the average acreage per subdivision phase per jurisdiction. Plant City had the highest number of acres per subdivision phase (67.10 acres). Temple Terrace had the lowest number of acres per subdivision phase (12.41 acres).

Figure 2b.  Residential and Nonresidential Acreage for Sample Subdivision Phases by Jurisdiction

This bar chart shows the share of subdivision phase acreage that is residential and nonresidential by jurisdiction. Temple Terrace had the highest residential share (67.57%). Tampa had the highest share of nonresidential acreage (67.86%).
This bar chart shows the share of subdivision phase acreage that is residential and nonresidential by jurisdiction. Temple Terrace had the highest residential share (67.57%). Tampa had the highest share of nonresidential acreage (67.86%).

Residential Units

Since 2015, 45,966 residential units have been built across these subdivision phases. Most of these units (42,650) were built in unincorporated Hillsborough County, averaging 81 units per subdivision phase. Plant City had the highest average residential units per subdivision phase (96 units), while Temple Terrace had the lowest (42 units). Table 3 and Figure 3 provide a detailed breakdown of residential unit statistics by jurisdiction.

Table 3 – Residential Unit Statistics for Sample Subdivision Phases by Jurisdiction

JurisdictionSubdivisions PhasesPercent2023 Residential UnitsPercentAverage 2023 Residential UnitsMinimumFirst QuartileMedianThird QuartileMaximum
Plant City111.86%1,0602.31%961423116139261
Tampa488.14%2,0904.55%4410143564126
Temple Terrace40.68%1660.36%421012366996
Unincorporated Hillsborough County52789.32%42,65092.79%81103863103557
Total590100.00%45,966100.00%78103660100557

Figure 3.  Residential and Nonresidential Acreage for Sample Subdivision Phases by Jurisdiction

This bar chart shows average residential units built since 2015 per subdivision phase by jurisdiction. Plant City had the highest average residential units built (96 average residential units). Temple Terrace had the lowest number of residential units per subdivision phase (42 average residential units).
This bar chart shows average residential units built since 2015 per subdivision phase by jurisdiction. Plant City had the highest average residential units built (96 average residential units). Temple Terrace had the lowest number of residential units per subdivision phase (42 average residential units).

Residential Acreage Share

The average share of subdivision phase acreage allocated to residential units is 58.41%, ranging from 6% to 100%. Plant City had the lowest average share (51.80%), while Temple Terrace had the highest (68.41%). These differences reflect varying land use priorities and environmental constraints. See Table 4 and Figures 4a and 4b.

Table 4 – Statistics for Residential Share of Subdivision Phase Acreage

JurisdictionAverageMinimumFirst QuartileMedianThird QuartileMaximum
Plant City51.80%18%31%44%69%98%
Tampa54.46%11%36%59%70%100%
Temple Terrace68.41%51%55%67%80%88%
Unincorporated Hillsborough County58.83%6%42%59%73%100%
Total58.41%6%42%59%73%100%

Figure 4a.  Residential and Nonresidential Acreage for Sample Subdivision Phases by Jurisdiction

This bar chart shows average share of subdivision phase acres for residential units. At 51.80%, Plant City had the lowest share. Alternatively, at 68.41%, Temple Terrace had the lowest share of subdivision phase acreage for residential units.
This bar chart shows average share of subdivision phase acres for residential units. At 51.80%, Plant City had the lowest share. Alternatively, at 68.41%, Temple Terrace had the lowest share of subdivision phase acreage for residential units.

Figure 4b.  590 Subdivision Phases with Residential Units Built Since 2015 by Residential Share of Acreage

This map shows the 590 subdivision phases discussed in this study. These subdivisions had single family homes built since 2015. Most of these subdivision phases are found in Unincorporated Hillsborough County. The subdivisions are color coded by their share of residential acreage. Yellow represents shares below 20%. Deep red represents shares above 80%. For the 10 subdivision phases with the lowest residential shares, their share range from 5.91% to 16.9%.
This map shows the 590 subdivision phases discussed in this study. These subdivisions had single family homes built since 2015. Most of these subdivision phases are found in Unincorporated Hillsborough County. The subdivisions are color coded by their share of residential acreage. Yellow represents shares below 20%. Deep red represents shares above 80%. For the 10 subdivision phases with the lowest residential shares, their share range from 5.91% to 16.9%.

Insights from Subdivisions with Low Residential Shares

We inspected the subdivision phases with the lowest residential shares to understand their land use patterns:

  1. North Park Isle Phase 2a (Plant City)**: 18.43% residential share, with significant land dedicated to flood control and open space. (Figure 5a)
  2. K Bar Ranch Parcel C (Tampa)**: 11.26% residential share, largely occupied by wetlands. (Figure 5b)
  3. Sagebrook (Temple Terrace)**: 51.49% residential share, with nonresidential acreage allocated to open space. (Figure 5c)
  4. Laurel Lakes (Seffner)**: 5.91% residential share, townhomes were placed on the highest strip of land.  The rest of the subdivision phase is  dominated by low-lying wetlands and retention ponds. (See Figure 5d).

Figure 5a.  North Park Isle Phase 2A (D0E)

This image is an aerial photograph of the North Park Isle Phase 2A (D0E) subdivision phase. It is located at the corner of Sam Allen Road and Park Road in Plant City. It shows that residential units are clustered the upland section of the parcel parallel to Sam Allen Road. It appears that rest of the parcel is made up of wetlands.
This image is an aerial photograph of the North Park Isle Phase 2A (D0E) subdivision phase. It is located at the corner of Sam Allen Road and Park Road in Plant City. It shows that residential units are clustered the upland section of the parcel parallel to Sam Allen Road. It appears that rest of the parcel is made up of wetlands.

Figure 5b.  K Bar Ranch Parcel C (A9S)

This image is an aerial photograph of the K Bar Ranch Parcel C (A9S) subdivision phase. It is located on K Bar Parkway in Tampa. It shows that residential units are clustered in the upland section. It appears that rest of the parcel is made up of wetlands and open space.
This image is an aerial photograph of the K Bar Ranch Parcel C (A9S) subdivision phase. It is located on K Bar Parkway in Tampa. It shows that residential units are clustered in the upland section. It appears that rest of the parcel is made up of wetlands and open space.

Figure 5c.  Sagebrook (B77)

This image is an aerial photograph of the Sagebrook (B77) subdivision phase. It is located on Morris Bridge Road in Temple Terrace. Within this subdivision phase, ,most of the parcels are residential parcels.
This image is an aerial photograph of the Sagebrook (B77) subdivision phase. It is located on Morris Bridge Road in Temple Terrace. Within this subdivision phase, ,most of the parcels are residential parcels.

Figure 5b.  Laurel Lakes (C74)

This image is an aerial photograph of the Laurel Lakes (C74) subdivision phase. It is located on Williams Road in Seffner. This subdivision phase is dominated by two large ponds with steeply sloping banks. The residential units are clustered in a narrow strip along Williams Road.
This image is an aerial photograph of the Laurel Lakes (C74) subdivision phase. It is located on Williams Road in Seffner. This subdivision phase is dominated by two large ponds with steeply sloping banks. The residential units are clustered in a narrow strip along Williams Road.

Conclusion

This analysis of 590 subdivision phases highlights significant variations in residential and nonresidential land use. Plant City’s subdivision phases had the lowest residential acreage share (51.80%), while Temple Terrace had the highest (68.41%). The nonresidential acreage in many subdivisions serves critical roles, such as flood control and providing amenities, underscoring its importance for sustainable and attractive residential development.